Search for: All records

Convective parameterization is the long-lasting bottleneck of global climate modelling and one of the most difficult problems in atmospheric sciences. Uncertainty in convective parameterization is the leading cause of the widespread climate sensitivity in IPCC global warming projections. This paper reviews the observations and parameterizations of atmospheric convection with emphasis on the cloud structure, bulk effects, and closure assumption. The representative state-of-the-art convection schemes are presented, including the ECMWF convection scheme, the Grell scheme used in NCEP model and WRF model, the Zhang-MacFarlane scheme used in NCAR and DOE models, and parameterizations of shallow moist convection. The observed convection has self-suppression mechanisms caused by entrainment in convective updrafts, surface cold pool generated by unsaturated convective downdrafts, and warm and dry lower troposphere created by mesoscale downdrafts. The post-convection environment is often characterized by “diamond sounding” suggesting an over-stabilization rather than barely returning to neutral state. Then the pre-convection environment is characterized by slow moistening of lower troposphere triggered by surface moisture convergence and other mechanisms. The over-stabilization and slow moistening make the convection events episodic and decouple the middle/upper troposphere from the boundary layer, making the state-type quasi-equilibrium hypothesis invalid. Right now, unsaturated convective downdrafts and especially mesoscale downdrafts are missing in most convection schemes, while some schemes are using undiluted convective updrafts, all of which favour easily turned-on convection linked to double-ITCZ (inter-tropical convergence zone), overly weak MJO (Madden-Julian Oscillation) and precocious diurnal precipitation maximum. We propose a new strategy for convection scheme development using reanalysis-driven model experiments such as the assimilation runs in weather prediction centres and the decadal prediction runs in climate modelling centres, aided by satellite simulators evaluating key characteristics such as the lifecycle of convective cloud-top distribution and stratiform precipitation fraction. 

Injections of wildfire smoke plumes into the free troposphere impact air quality, yet model forecasts of injections are poor. Here, we use aircraft observations obtained during the 2019 western US wildfires (FIREX-AQ) to evaluate a commonly used smoke plume rise parameterization in two atmospheric chemistry-transport models (WRF-Chem and HRRR-Smoke). Observations show that smoke injections into the free troposphere occur in 35% of plumes, whereas the models forecast 59–95% indicating false injections in the simulations. False injections were associated with both models overestimating fire heat flux and terrain height, and with WRF-Chem underestimating planetary boundary layer height. We estimate that the radiant fraction of heat flux is 0.5 to 25 times larger in models than in observations, depending on fuel type. Model performance was substantially improved by using observed heat flux and boundary layer heights, confirming that models need accurate heat fluxes and boundary layer heights to correctly forecast plume injections.

 

Abstract. Wildfire smoke is one of the most significant concerns ofhuman and environmental health, associated with its substantial impacts onair quality, weather, and climate. However, biomass burning emissions andsmoke remain among the largest sources of uncertainties in air qualityforecasts. In this study, we evaluate the smoke emissions and plumeforecasts from 12 state-of-the-art air quality forecasting systemsduring the Williams Flats fire in Washington State, US, August 2019, whichwas intensively observed during the Fire Influence on Regional to GlobalEnvironments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) field campaign. Model forecasts withlead times within 1 d are intercompared under the same framework basedon observations from multiple platforms to reveal their performanceregarding fire emissions, aerosol optical depth (AOD), surface PM2.5,plume injection, and surface PM2.5 to AOD ratio. The comparison ofsmoke organic carbon (OC) emissions suggests a large range of daily totalsamong the models, with a factor of 20 to 50. Limited representations of thediurnal patterns and day-to-day variations of emissions highlight the needto incorporate new methodologies to predict the temporal evolution andreduce uncertainty of smoke emission estimates. The evaluation of smoke AOD(sAOD) forecasts suggests overall underpredictions in both the magnitude andsmoke plume area for nearly all models, although the high-resolution modelshave a better representation of the fine-scale structures of smoke plumes.The models driven by fire radiativepower (FRP)-based fire emissions or assimilating satellite AODdata generally outperform the others. Additionally, limitations of thepersistence assumption used when predicting smoke emissions are revealed bysubstantial underpredictions of sAOD on 8 August 2019, mainly over thetransported smoke plumes, owing to the underestimated emissions on7 August. In contrast, the surface smoke PM2.5 (sPM2.5) forecastsshow both positive and negative overall biases for these models, with mostmembers presenting more considerable diurnal variations of sPM2.5.Overpredictions of sPM2.5 are found for the models driven by FRP-basedemissions during nighttime, suggesting the necessity to improve verticalemission allocation within and above the planetary boundary layer (PBL).Smoke injection heights are further evaluated using the NASA LangleyResearch Center's Differential Absorption High Spectral Resolution Lidar(DIAL-HSRL) data collected during the flight observations. As the firebecame stronger over 3–8 August, the plume height became deeper, with aday-to-day range of about 2–9 km a.g.l. However, narrower ranges arefound for all models, with a tendency of overpredicting the plume heights forthe shallower injection transects and underpredicting for the days showingdeeper injections. The misrepresented plume injection heights lead toinaccurate vertical plume allocations along the transects corresponding totransported smoke that is 1 d old. Discrepancies in model performance forsurface PM2.5 and AOD are further suggested by the evaluation of theirratio, which cannot be compensated for by solely adjusting the smoke emissionsbut are more attributable to model representations of plume injections,besides other possible factors including the evolution of PBL depths andaerosol optical property assumptions. By consolidating multiple forecastsystems, these results provide strategic insight on pathways to improvesmoke forecasts. 

ABSTRACT To explore the various couplings across space and time and between ecosystems in a consistent manner, atmospheric modeling is moving away from the fractured limited-scale modeling strategy of the past toward a unification of the range of scales inherent in the Earth system. This paper describes the forward-looking Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA), which is intended to become the next-generation community infrastructure for research involving atmospheric chemistry and aerosols. MUSICA will be developed collaboratively by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and university and government researchers, with the goal of serving the international research and applications communities. The capability of unifying various spatiotemporal scales, coupling to other Earth system components, and process-level modularization will allow advances in both fundamental and applied research in atmospheric composition, air quality, and climate and is also envisioned to become a platform that addresses the needs of policy makers and stakeholders. 

The Developmental Testbed Center (DTC) tested two convective parameterization schemes in the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model and compared them in terms of performance of forecasting tropical cyclones (TCs). Several TC forecasts were conducted with the scale-aware Simplified Arakawa Schubert (SAS) and Grell–Freitas (GF) convective schemes over the Atlantic basin. For this sample of over 100 cases, the storm track and intensity forecasts were superior for the GF scheme compared to SAS. A case study showed improved storm structure for GF when compared with radar observations. The GF run had increased inflow in the boundary layer, which resulted in higher angular momentum. An angular momentum budget analysis shows that the difference in the contribution of the eddy transport to the total angular momentum tendency is small between the two forecasts. The main difference is in the mean transport term, especially in the boundary layer. The temperature tendencies indicate higher contribution from the microphysics and cumulus heating above the boundary layer in the GF run. A temperature budget analysis indicated that both the temperature advection and diabatic heating were the dominant terms and they were larger near the storm center in the GF run than in the SAS run. The above results support the superior performance of the GF scheme for TC intensity forecast.